i think this qualifies

[pman5412]

PokerStars Game #29724027602: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2009/06/24 6:56:05 ETTable 'Sirona X' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: mukzR ($92.75 in chips)
Seat 2: pman5412 ($15.25 in chips)
Seat 3: FathSon ($50 in chips)
Seat 4: Pokerhai5 ($35.30 in chips)
Seat 5: Masonfw ($12.25 in chips)
Seat 6: effewachtte ($8.65 in chips)
pman5412: posts small blind $0.25
FathSon: posts big blind $0.50
*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to pman5412 [  ]
Pokerhai5: folds
Masonfw: folds
effewachtte: calls $0.50
mukzR: calls $0.50
pman5412: raises $2 to $2.50
FathSon: folds
effewachtte: calls $2
mukzR: folds
*** FLOP *** [    ]
pman5412: bets $3
effewachtte: raises $3 to $6
pman5412: raises $3 to $9
effewachtte: calls $0.15 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($2.85) returned to pman5412
*** TURN *** [    ] [ ]
*** RIVER *** [      ] []
*** SHOW DOWN ***pman5412: shows [  ] (two pair, Kings and Eights)
effewachtte: shows [  ] (a straight, Four to Eight)
effewachtte collected $17.40 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***Total pot $18.30 | Rake $0.90
Board [        ]
Seat 1: mukzR (button) folded before Flop
Seat 2: pman5412 (small blind) showed [Kh Kd] and lost with two pair, Kings and Eights
Seat 3: FathSon (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Pokerhai5 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Masonfw folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: effewachtte showed [  ] and won ($17.40) with a straight, Four to Eight

[R-Ho]

Yeah, that's a donkey move on the part of your opponent; he didn't have any money left after his one attempt to push you off..which is an argument that he shouldn't have bet in the first place.  He won, that's how it goes sometimes.

R-Ho

[Martini]

Yeah, the guy is down to needing runners. The most charitable explanation I can think of is that he misread his hole cards and thought he had 87 instead of 67.

[dugthefish]

Yeah, the guy is down to needing runners. The most charitable explanation I can think of is that he misread his hole cards and thought he had 87 instead of 67.

too charitable.  how do u misread ur cards ONLINE?!?  i mean, aren't they right there, winking at u? 

im with r-ho; the next time u see him, give him a 'donkey' note

[Martini]

Yeah, the guy is down to needing runners. The most charitable explanation I can think of is that he misread his hole cards and thought he had 87 instead of 67.

too charitable.  how do u misread ur cards ONLINE?!?  i mean, aren't they right there, winking at u? 

im with r-ho; the next time u see him, give him a 'donkey' note

Well, it's not like he mistook Queens for Deuces. The 8 and 6 are reasonably similar to each other. And if he's mutitabling then even more reason that a mistake could happen. I don't know what happened for sure. All I'm saying is that he would not be the first or last person to misread his cards, even online. And that thinking he had an 8 would explain the play in the hand.

[pman5412]

Yeah, the guy is down to needing runners. The most charitable explanation I can think of is that he misread his hole cards and thought he had 87 instead of 67.

too charitable.  how do u misread ur cards ONLINE?!?  i mean, aren't they right there, winking at u? 

im with r-ho; the next time u see him, give him a 'donkey' note

already noted with donkey ... in capital letters no doubt!

[dugthefish]

already noted with donkey ... in capital letters no doubt!

LMAO