|
|
|
Martini
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Apr 24, 2009 at 18:48 » |
|
Well he could have caught a Seven on the Turn to give him an open ender and then he would have eight more outs on the River. How could he miss?  I had the same thing happen couple weeks ago. I had bottom Set versus a medium King on a 35K Flop. I raise him on the Flop then get the rest in on the Turn when the board pairs Fives. River...King. Oh well. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
(not a real alcoholic beverage)
|
|
|
|
luckystraights
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 03:19 » |
|
The best thing was that even in the grip of my first real downswing in 6 months I resisted insulting the guy and just said nh in the chat... I did need a few deep breaths though lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Martini
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 03:37 » |
|
The best thing was that even in the grip of my first real downswing in 6 months I resisted insulting the guy and just said nh in the chat... I did need a few deep breaths though lol.
Btw, "nh" is the most insulting passive aggressive thing you can say to someone who sucked out as bad as he did. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
(not a real alcoholic beverage)
|
|
|
tlovingc
Regular
Posts: 164
All bleeding stops eventually.
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 04:05 » |
|
You played .01/.02 poker for all that time and never had someone hit a 7%er on the river? It feels bad now, but you'll get back on that upswing soon enough.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I know enough to know I don't know enough.
|
|
|
|
luckystraights
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 04:44 » |
|
The best thing was that even in the grip of my first real downswing in 6 months I resisted insulting the guy and just said nh in the chat... I did need a few deep breaths though lol.
Btw, "nh" is the most insulting passive aggressive thing you can say to someone who sucked out as bad as he did. Maybe if your passive aggressive, I ain't. It was more of "I don't need to moan here", next hand dearl please type of thing |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
luckystraights
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 04:48 » |
|
You played .01/.02 poker for all that time and never had someone hit a 7%er on the river? It feels bad now, but you'll get back on that upswing soon enough.
I'm supprised he was in such good shape. I don't recall that many bad beats from 2nl, I've had a fair few 2 outers recently but ussually for only 50BB's or less. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
luckystraights
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 11:43 » |
|
The biggest shame is that this type of player is ussually the single table type and I'll probably never see him again.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Martini
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 11:55 » |
|
The biggest shame is that this type of player is ussually the single table type and I'll probably never see him again.
Well at least you have the right attitude that you WANT to be playing against this guy despite him pillaging your chip stack. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
(not a real alcoholic beverage)
|
|
|
|
luckystraights
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 12:37 » |
|
The biggest shame is that this type of player is ussually the single table type and I'll probably never see him again.
Well at least you have the right attitude that you WANT to be playing against this guy despite him pillaging your chip stack. Yep, he's on my buddy list, though I don't check it as much as I should, as like I said most droolers are one suck out wonders lol. I have my fish tags then fish in my buddy list. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Martini
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 12:46 » |
|
The biggest shame is that this type of player is ussually the single table type and I'll probably never see him again.
Well at least you have the right attitude that you WANT to be playing against this guy despite him pillaging your chip stack. Yep, he's on my buddy list, though I don't check it as much as I should, as like I said most droolers are one suck out wonders lol. I have my fish tags then fish in my buddy list. LOL. It would be *really* interesting to see the stats on players who show up on the largest amounts of buddy lists. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
(not a real alcoholic beverage)
|
|
|
|
luckystraights
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 12:57 » |
|
Perhaps we could start a thread going where we list our top 5 fish, or the most recent 5. It might be fairer to exclude the last 2 or 3 characters from the names though, they should be enough left for comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Martini
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 13:22 » |
|
Perhaps we could start a thread going where we list our top 5 fish, or the most recent 5. It might be fairer to exclude the last 2 or 3 characters from the names though, they should be enough left for comparison.
The geek in me says you should compare hashes of the screen names. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
(not a real alcoholic beverage)
|
|
|
|
luckystraights
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 13:29 » |
|
Perhaps we could start a thread going where we list our top 5 fish, or the most recent 5. It might be fairer to exclude the last 2 or 3 characters from the names though, they should be enough left for comparison.
The geek in me says you should compare hashes of the screen names. the ex-geek in my, feels like a noob for not knowing how to do that. When I started to think about poker, I pushed out all of my computer knowledge or so it seems lol. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Martini
|
|
« Reply #15 on: Apr 25, 2009 at 13:31 » |
|
Perhaps we could start a thread going where we list our top 5 fish, or the most recent 5. It might be fairer to exclude the last 2 or 3 characters from the names though, they should be enough left for comparison.
The geek in me says you should compare hashes of the screen names. the ex-geek in my, feels like a noob for not knowing how to do that. When I started to think about poker, I pushed out all of my computer knowledge or so it seems lol. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
(not a real alcoholic beverage)
|
|
|
tlovingc
Regular
Posts: 164
All bleeding stops eventually.
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Apr 28, 2009 at 03:53 » |
|
Perhaps we could start a thread going where we list our top 5 fish, or the most recent 5. It might be fairer to exclude the last 2 or 3 characters from the names though, they should be enough left for comparison.
The geek in me says you should compare hashes of the screen names. I have a list of fish in a notepad file that I have a script look for after I sign in to the lobby. It would be a pretty neat thread for us all to post our top 5 fish. It's just comparing the hashes in the posts for duplicates......... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I know enough to know I don't know enough.
|
|
|
|
kimert
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Apr 28, 2009 at 04:30 » |
|
Perhaps we could start a thread going where we list our top 5 fish, or the most recent 5. It might be fairer to exclude the last 2 or 3 characters from the names though, they should be enough left for comparison.
The geek in me says you should compare hashes of the screen names. I have a list of fish in a notepad file that I have a script look for after I sign in to the lobby. It would be a pretty neat thread for us all to post our top 5 fish. It's just comparing the hashes in the posts for duplicates......... Not so cool if one of the fishes where a member of HPT... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NotFadeAway
Regular
Posts: 4403
4 8 15 16 23 42
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Apr 28, 2009 at 10:16 » |
|
Perhaps we could start a thread going where we list our top 5 fish, or the most recent 5. It might be fairer to exclude the last 2 or 3 characters from the names though, they should be enough left for comparison.
The geek in me says you should compare hashes of the screen names. I have a list of fish in a notepad file that I have a script look for after I sign in to the lobby. It would be a pretty neat thread for us all to post our top 5 fish. It's just comparing the hashes in the posts for duplicates......... I think I'll pass... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Take my love. Take my land. Take me where I cannot stand. I don't care. I'm still free. You can't take the sky from me.
|
|
|
|
luckystraights
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Apr 28, 2009 at 12:58 » |
|
Perhaps we could start a thread going where we list our top 5 fish, or the most recent 5. It might be fairer to exclude the last 2 or 3 characters from the names though, they should be enough left for comparison.
The geek in me says you should compare hashes of the screen names. I have a list of fish in a notepad file that I have a script look for after I sign in to the lobby. It would be a pretty neat thread for us all to post our top 5 fish. It's just comparing the hashes in the posts for duplicates......... I use a notepad file also, to record those who hit and log off. What script do you use? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Martini
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Apr 28, 2009 at 14:23 » |
|
Btw, the SHA-1 hash of username "luckystraights" is: 1dac76db26940d48554815c22073691b0903e1da Just sayin'... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
(not a real alcoholic beverage)
|
|
|
|
luckystraights
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Apr 28, 2009 at 14:32 » |
|
Btw, the SHA-1 hash of username "luckystraights" is: 1dac76db26940d48554815c22073691b0903e1da Just sayin'... cool... I'd actually love to know who's got me on their fish list. I meant appear on the regs list on 2p2 when I hit 25nl. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
