Your read on the original raiser was proved correct, but do you think he would have called for half his stack with AJ or anything else that you were ahead of? It seems like you put yourself in a position that you'd only get called if you're beat. You have position, you have a raiser who you suspect to be light, you could flat call there and then plan to raise a c-bet to take down the pot.
I would have been happy if the pre-flop raiser would have folded, and I had picked up the pot right there, without the risk of seeing a flop. The dead money would have allowed me to be more selective as the blinds increased again which would have otherwise put me under the 10 big blinds threshold.
I was willing to risk the raiser calling with AK or a pocket pair, as I didn't put him on a pair above ten's at best and reasoned that in my chip position a race was worth it, but by going all-in I gave myself the best chance I could to win the dead money which was my main aim at that point.
I was the SB, I would have been first to act and unless an ace came on the flop I would still be in a dangerous position, assuming of course the player behind also called the initial raise. Without an ace I would have to check, and with two people in the hand, I would again be put to a fold or push decision only with fewer chips to do it, and greater pot odds offered to my opponents. I would have probably folded without flopping an ace here, which would leave me with only 10 BB's facing a blind increase which would have severely limited my play, which is why I pushed to tray and pick up the pot pre-flop.
It's unlucky that the BB woke up with KK but I don't know that you had to go broke on the hand. If you call and he then re-raises out of the blind that's pretty strong and you can still fold.
agreed, but as discussed above I didn't see flat calling as an option. With more chips I likely would have simply called, not wanting to risk going broke with only AQ out of position and would have had an easy laydown to a re-raise from the BB.
BTW, you didn't lose to a set, you lost to the hand that was always ahead.
I know I was behind on the outset, that was never in dispute, but my opponent hitting a set, when a similar thing lead to me busting out in my previous two games increased the pain, and for release of frustration if nothing else was worth mentioning :p
Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate all the advise to try and improve my decisions next time I'm in a similar position.